GTG 1922 Peace Dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Scott J, Jun 12, 2021.

?

GTG

  1. AU 55

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. AU 58

    3 vote(s)
    20.0%
  3. MS 60

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. MS 61

    1 vote(s)
    6.7%
  5. Ms 62

    4 vote(s)
    26.7%
  6. Ms 63

    4 vote(s)
    26.7%
  7. Ms64

    2 vote(s)
    13.3%
  8. Ms 65

    1 vote(s)
    6.7%
  9. Other

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

    GTG - 1922 Peace Dollar - My images and Seller images. 20210611_130540.jpg 20210611_130711.jpg SmartSelect_20210612-182248_Chrome.jpg SmartSelect_20210612-182354_Chrome.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Dima

    Dima Member

    Thinking MS62

    Edit -- I'm a bit torn. Top two photos show plenty of bag/contact marks, leading to MS61 guess; however, the latter two photos suggest plenty of luster and a strong strike, leading to MS63. Figured I'd split the difference :p
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2021
    Scott J likes this.
  4. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Top photos are of a circulated coin, with not only contact marks, but light wear= AU 58

    Bottom photos are of MS coin, probably 63.
    So, I will split the difference at MS 61, since I don’t know which pictures accurately represent the actual coin.
     
    Scott J and Dima like this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Your photos and the sellers photos are a different coin. Not sure who’s are who’s but the second coin is much better.
     
    Morgandude11 and Scott J like this.
  6. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

    The second coin matches the grade, it is the same coin with blown highlights. It is graded probably 1 grade higher than I would.
    Edit - Maybe 2 grades higher than it deserves.
    NGC graded and never been disappointed from them or from the seller before.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2021
  7. Mike Thornton

    Mike Thornton Learning something new everyday.

    I’m leaning to both sets of photos are the same coin but the second set has been altered, softened contrast. I would think it would grade MS 61. 62 on a good day. Not seeing circulation wear but plenty of bag marks and a somewhat weak strike. MHO
     
    Scott J likes this.
  8. Dima

    Dima Member

    Definitely the same coin; just radically different lighting and camera settings.
     
    Scott J likes this.
  9. Mike Thorne

    Mike Thorne Well-Known Member

  10. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    O-horz.jpg
    Mix and match.
     
    ripple and Scott J like this.
  11. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    63 on both, but many go 64 with these blemishes. Good luster.
     
    Scott J likes this.
  12. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    First photos AU-58. Bag marks, finger print, general wear. Second pic's, put on separate post by itself. Good luck
     
    Scott J likes this.
  13. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

    Definitely the same coin. Look at the scratch under WE
    The soft light and slight overexposure on the second set softens and hides blemishes. It may have been unfair to take the contrasty, hard light photos, but that's what I saw when I opened the mail. I was a bit disappointed, expecting more for the grade, but the coin looks great sitting on the coffee table with soft, overhead light.
     
  14. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    I say AU-58 also .
     
  15. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

    Thanks for participating!!
    The poll average was 61.7
    My guess might have been 63.
    Anyway............ SmartSelect_20210612-182325_Chrome.jpg
     
  16. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Nice coin. It definitely has eye appeal. However seeing it in the slab reinforces my opinion that the coin was over graded. I agree with your 62-63 assessment. The seller’s pictures were useless.
     
    Scott J likes this.
  17. Mike Thorne

    Mike Thorne Well-Known Member

    The first two pics make the coin look terrible, which is why I said 61. It looks a lot better in the slab. 64 better? That's another question.
     
    Scott J likes this.
  18. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

    Agreed
     
  19. Atarian

    Atarian Well-Known Member

    Like magic the fingerprint went away. I would have guessed 63 and been wrong.
     
    Scott J likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page