Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 3732723, member: 24314&quot;]C-B-D, posted: &quot;I think actually have one that I submitted to PCGS and it came back Altered Surfaces. So I cracked and sent to NGC and they called it MS64.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>The &quot;Altered Surface&quot; grade is very deceptive because A/S includes anything from &quot;market acceptable&quot; to &quot;fraudulently doctored.&quot;&nbsp; Apparently the TPGS&#039;s disagreed or one <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie45" alt=":eggface:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> may have missed something obvious!&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie57" alt=":jawdrop:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Prez2, posted: Paid opinion [<i>from knowledgeable professionals</i>] is what it amounts to. All [<i>grading not authentication</i>] being subjective. That&#039;s one thing that&#039;s really wrong with the authenticating services. It should be one standard but it&#039;s not.&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in