Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 3727827, member: 21705&quot;]The reverse differences in the 63&#039;s can be accounted for by a later die state with greater wear of the reverse die. But only photo illusions would account for apparent rub on the cheek and jaw. I won&#039;t even get into the nicks and luster arguments which only come into play if you agree with MS.</p><p><br /></p><p>ps I&#039;m a devote&#039; of EAC grading so I typically grade at least one to two grades lower than TPGs. I believe EAC grading is the last bastion of consistent grading over time in an era of grade inflation.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in