GTG; 1921 Alabama Commemorative

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Beefer518, Apr 22, 2021.

?

Grade is:

  1. AU58 or Lower

    2 vote(s)
    10.0%
  2. MS60

    1 vote(s)
    5.0%
  3. MS61

    3 vote(s)
    15.0%
  4. MS62

    7 vote(s)
    35.0%
  5. MS63

    4 vote(s)
    20.0%
  6. MS64

    2 vote(s)
    10.0%
  7. MS65

    2 vote(s)
    10.0%
  8. MS66

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. Plus

    1 vote(s)
    5.0%
  10. CAC

    5 vote(s)
    25.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    Just got this in the mail today.

    I know how you guys love doing Commemorative GTG's (o_O), I knew I had to get this up as soon as possible. ;)

    My pics aren't the greatest (rushed/experimental), so I'm also including seller's pics (2nd set).
    Color is truer in seller's photos, and is just a tad more golden.

    Obv-HDR-Web.jpg Rev-HDR-Web.jpg Orig Obv.jpg Orig Rev.jpg
     
    Mac McDonald, green18, NSP and 2 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

  4. William F

    William F Well-Known Member

    That's tough... I'm not sure but I went MS61+
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I’m not good at Commemoratives and the toning makes it hard to see the coin but I went MS-62 on it.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  6. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    I'm not familiar with this issue so I don't know if the reverse is wear or weak strike. Since I don't see wear on the obverse, I'm going to say the reverse is very weakly struck. I don't see any distracting marks, so I'm going to say MS-62.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  7. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

    What a tough coin to grade from photos. I’ll go with MS63. I like the original surfaces, Looks like something CAC would like too.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  8. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 63....I don't think there is any wear, it's a bit crusty, and overall it looks nice
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  9. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    '65.....and I like your shots better, Beefer. :)
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  10. markr

    markr Active Member

    I know this issue comes weakly truck but this example seems especially weakly struck, especially as noted by @Publius2 on the reverse. It's hard to see through the toning but the fields look good, so I think it's definitely MS. I, personally, am not a huge fan of the toning but this may be the photos. I can't tell about the luster, which makes grading the coin tough. I'll go MS63.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  11. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    I think commems with this look often get graded MS62.
    I'm probably well off the mark...
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  12. Mac McDonald

    Mac McDonald Well-Known Member

    If your pics are "rushed/experimental," you're doing pretty good...!
     
    Beefer518 and green18 like this.
  13. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    At least they look honest..........:)
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  14. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    I'm at Ms-63 CAC assuming poor strike of reverse.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  15. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Active Member

    MS62 weak strike
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  16. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & avid numismatist Moderator

    I wavered between 63 and 64. Gave it the benefit of the doubt and threw my dart at 64.
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  17. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    I went with 63 also
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  18. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I am sure that this coin is in a Mint State holder, but I don’t think it’s Unc. This issue does come flat struck on the highest points of the first portrait and more so on the eagle on the reverse. Having said that, those points look to be flatly struck and rubbed to me. The toning complicates things, especially when you are grading from photos.

    My guess is that it’s in an MS-61 holder. My “real grade” is AU-58.
     
    Mountain Man and Beefer518 like this.
  19. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Supporter! Supporter

    I'll piggy back on John's post above, but I've seen heavily toned coins such as this one, graded at MS66, if the appearance of wear is just a weak strike. On this coin, the eagle looks worn to me, not just a weak strike. JMHO
     
    Beefer518 and johnmilton like this.
  20. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

  21. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page