GTG 1920 Pilgrim

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Hommer, Apr 29, 2016.

  1. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    AU-50
     
    Hommer likes this.
  4. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I think I see rub, which means AU-58. However, I can see a market grade of MS-62.
     
    Hommer likes this.
  5. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    The funny thing is that this isn't a Lincoln. I posted the wrong coin. Lol Anyway, have at it.
     
  6. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    I was going to say something , but figured the zincoid cent just turned into a Pilgrim commem . AU-55 .
     
    Hommer likes this.
  7. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    Fixed it
     
    rzage likes this.
  8. brandon spiegel

    brandon spiegel Brandon Spiegel

  9. brandon spiegel

    brandon spiegel Brandon Spiegel

    heck, between a 45 and a 50- a 47.5
     
  10. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

  11. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    All in, all done?
     
  12. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    Out on a limb at '63.
     
    Hommer likes this.
  13. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    Looks like a bit of die wear (reverse) on Tercentenary. I've got an 21 Pilgrim with the same phenomena........I'll post it later after Hommer gives us the results.
     
    rzage and Hommer like this.
  14. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    With all that luster , you could be spot on !
     
  15. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

  16. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I'll guess 55, just because it worked in another thread.
     
    rzage and Paul M. like this.
  17. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    I'm not a big fan of slabs and even less so of this one. I bought the coin, not the holder and at some point, will set it free. It was very hard trying to get a decent photo of the coin without getting the reflection of the camera and/or the light in the photo. For those of you that guessed based on luster, the photos don't do the coin justice, it is a very lustrous coin.
    image.jpg image.jpg
     
    green18 and Paul M. like this.
  18. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I'm sure the coin is much nicer than the pictures show, but I only had the pictures to make a judgement. However, I did see the coin had amost full luster, if mot full luster.
     
  19. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    No offense to anyone, but this is why I think GTG is not as effective as it could be. Members are just guessing instead of using the images to ascertain an accurate grade.
     
  20. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    I should have said '64. Mine's a '64 too.

    DSC_2035.JPG DSC_2034.JPG
     
    Hommer likes this.
  21. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    Nice.
    The design of these coins tend to hide the luster in photos. The fields aren't flat as in a Walker or Morgan so photos that catch luster tend to wash out the details. Many commemoratives have these types of design and slabs make photos even more challenging.
     
    green18 and Paul M. like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page