I was going to say something , but figured the zincoid cent just turned into a Pilgrim commem . AU-55 .
Looks like a bit of die wear (reverse) on Tercentenary. I've got an 21 Pilgrim with the same phenomena........I'll post it later after Hommer gives us the results.
I'm not a big fan of slabs and even less so of this one. I bought the coin, not the holder and at some point, will set it free. It was very hard trying to get a decent photo of the coin without getting the reflection of the camera and/or the light in the photo. For those of you that guessed based on luster, the photos don't do the coin justice, it is a very lustrous coin.
I'm sure the coin is much nicer than the pictures show, but I only had the pictures to make a judgement. However, I did see the coin had amost full luster, if mot full luster.
No offense to anyone, but this is why I think GTG is not as effective as it could be. Members are just guessing instead of using the images to ascertain an accurate grade.
Nice. The design of these coins tend to hide the luster in photos. The fields aren't flat as in a Walker or Morgan so photos that catch luster tend to wash out the details. Many commemoratives have these types of design and slabs make photos even more challenging.