Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Mac McDonald, post: 6686965, member: 117420&quot;]Yes, indeed a nice-looker. Have seen better strikes...lacks more netting detail (have seen almost complete) up the ship&#039;s masts for one thing.&nbsp; Many years ago when PCGS returned rejected coins in &quot;body bags&quot;...before slabbing as AU or MS &quot;details&quot;...I&#039;d have been concerned with the obverse-field hairlines...someone said die polish marks and maybe so/maybe not, but have seen rejections for otherwise decent/handsome coins for less.&nbsp; Since it or &quot;other&quot; isn&#039;t an option to select from...and not sure I would with just the pics (and good ones!)...I went with a 64 but wouldn&#039;t be surprised by a 58, either, with possibly some traces...&quot;whisps&quot;...of very light wear across some of the sleeve wrinkles and on the hand and book corner.&nbsp; It&#039;s so ridiculously (too) subjective and nit-picky...makes you think you see/imagine things that aren&#039;t there sometimes. Didn&#039;t mean to write so much.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in