GTG - 1919 WLH

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Koincollector1, Oct 14, 2019.

Page 2 of 2
  1. Derek2200

    Derek2200 Well-Known Member

    AU 50
     
    Derek2200, Oct 15, 2019
    #21 + Quote Reply
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. John Wright

    John Wright Well-Known Member

     
    John Wright, Oct 15, 2019
    #22 + Quote Reply
  4. John Wright

    John Wright Well-Known Member

    By EAC standards, this would be a nice VF35 to XF40 -- definitely worn but v.nice.
     
    John Wright, Oct 15, 2019
    #23 + Quote Reply
  5. buckeye73

    buckeye73 Well-Known Member

    Did not receive Coin Talk on my phone today until just after noon today after the reveal, but I was wavering between AU 55 and 58. Nice origin coin... thank goodness not dipped.
     
    buckeye73, Oct 15, 2019
    #24 + Quote Reply
  6. buckeye73

    buckeye73 Well-Known Member

    Do you happen to be John D. Wright, with obvious familiarity with The Cent Book?
     
    buckeye73, Oct 15, 2019
    #25 + Quote Reply
  7. Jim Dale

    Jim Dale Well-Known Member

    B U T ful. Wish I had one.
     
    Jim Dale, Oct 15, 2019
    #26 + Quote Reply
  8. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Better stick to copper, bud. That's a ridiculously low grading guess.... EAC or not!
     
    C-B-D, Oct 15, 2019
    #27 + Quote Reply
    TypeCoin971793, Johndoe2000$ and Lehigh96 like this.
  9. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I sometimes wonder if some EAC folks try to see how low they can make their grades.

    Especially when buying...
     
    TypeCoin971793, Oct 16, 2019
    #28 + Quote Reply
    Johndoe2000$ and lordmarcovan like this.
  10. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    Nailed it!
     
    Paul M., Oct 16, 2019
    #29 + Quote Reply
    Koincollector1 likes this.
  11. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    I was low. Was gonna say 50.
     
    lordmarcovan, Oct 16, 2019
    #30 + Quote Reply
  12. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    Don’t feel bad. My first thought was 45. The obverse fields look especially handled and lusterless. But the reverse is just terrific. AU 55 seems good to me.
     
    RonSanderson, Oct 16, 2019
    #31 + Quote Reply
  13. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    Yes, that reverse is way too nice for 45.

    And I like the coin, despite the subdued luster or lack thereof.
     
    lordmarcovan, Oct 16, 2019
    #32 + Quote Reply
    RonSanderson likes this.
  14. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    I'm late, but I see an AU for sure. Can't see any visible ware either. May be a low MS.
     
    chascat, Oct 16, 2019
    #33 + Quote Reply
  15. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    Nice coin! my guess was 50.
     
    ksparrow, Oct 16, 2019
    #34 + Quote Reply
Page 2 of 2
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page