GTG: 1917-D Standing Liberty Quarter

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Jim-P, Jun 8, 2021.

  1. Jim-P

    Jim-P Well-Known Member

    Got some True-Views from PCGS today.

    Hints: it graded lower than I expected; has more luster in hand than in the photo.

    1917-D SLQ Obverse.jpg 1917-D SLQ Reverse.jpg
     
    Dimedude2 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    AU55 is what I’d grade it, but to be fair, it looks like it has had an old cleaning and would not have surprised me if it did not straight grade.
     
    ripple likes this.
  4. Jeffjay

    Jeffjay Well-Known Member

  5. MIGuy

    MIGuy Supporter! Supporter

    MS63 and is close to full head. Beautiful! Love the SLQ design.
     
  6. Jim-P

    Jim-P Well-Known Member

    Good point, I forgot to put that it graded cleanly.
     
  7. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    I think it got a straight grade AU55.
     
    Two Dogs and mikenoodle like this.
  8. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

  9. Jim-P

    Jim-P Well-Known Member

    Survey Said!

    mikenoodle and CamaroDMD got it. AU55.

    cert_42241261_trueview_217089340_Large.jpg
     
  10. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  11. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    You should really let these go for at least 24 hours.
    Nice looking SLQ.
     
  12. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    I'm wondering why it didn't grade higher .
     
  13. Jim-P

    Jim-P Well-Known Member

    Will do. Thanks for the advice.
     
    CoinJockey73 likes this.
  14. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    AU-55, not fair. That is a beautiful coin, somebody forgot to put on their glasses, duh! You were cheated on that one, should have been higher... This exactly why I do not TPG my coins. Thanks for sharing.
     
  15. LRC-Tom

    LRC-Tom Been around the block...

    Very light wear visible on the knee and the shield. I would have put it at AU-58.
     
  16. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    @Jim-P, that is one killer AU55!!!
     
    Jim-P likes this.
  17. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I would go AU-58. It has a rub on the knee, but many times they ignore that and call it low end Mint State. Maybe the frosty luster prompted them to down grade it. It’s amazing how attracted so graders can to shiny objects. It gets them ignor scratches and even a rub now and then.
     
  18. schnickelfritz48

    schnickelfritz48 Well-Known Member

    I'd grade it at AU-58, I think the level of wear especially on the shield would validate that grade. It's a really nice SLQ, I wouldn't be happy with the PCGS evaluation.
     
  19. Jim-P

    Jim-P Well-Known Member

    That's the way the cookie crumbles. At least there's only a marginal difference in estimated value of a 55 vs. a 58. I expect I've got some [and will get some] that went the other way, too!
     
    Two Dogs likes this.
  20. Mac McDonald

    Mac McDonald Well-Known Member

    Like AU58...? (was going to to be my guess if had more time). It shows some light wear on the head and leg areas...and maybe if suspect of cleaning they dinged it from 58 to 55. Who knows...but when cleaning is not obvious or is so old it's mostly worn off/away and can't really be determined, no need to ruin otherwise nice coins to a "details" coffin.
     
    Two Dogs likes this.
  21. Mike Thorne

    Mike Thorne Well-Known Member

    I see that I got here too late to guess before the reveal. Like some others, I was going to say AU55.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page