GTG 1916 Standing Liberty Quarter

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Koincollector1, Oct 16, 2019.

  1. Koincollector1

    Koincollector1 Active Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. C-B-D

    C-B-D U.S. Type Coins or death!

  4. BuffaloHunter

    BuffaloHunter Short of a full herd

    +1
     
  5. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & odd Moderator

    +2

    PS- twist my arm hard enough and I might go 55.

    PPS- wow.
     
  6. Johndoe2000$

    Johndoe2000$ Well-Known Member

    AU50.
    Daring to be different I guess.
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  7. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    Nice luster on the reverse.
    Why is there toning on the head/obverse and not the reverse?
    It must have been stored before being encapsulated.
    Great to see coins like this.
     
  8. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    AU 53. Back seems better, front does not have as much definition.

    But it would be plenty nice in my set.
     
  9. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

  10. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

  11. QuintupleSovereign

    QuintupleSovereign Active Member

  12. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    AU50 (and before I looked at anybody else’s)
     
  13. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I’m the high grader, AU-55. I am assuming that the less than flattering toning has not been called “environmental damage.”
     
  14. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    I think it's fairly graded at 50, but I'm going to say they were ultra conservative and go with 45 (or 45+ if it's a late enough generation holder).
     
  15. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'll go with AU-55 but I don't really care for the look of the coin.
     
  16. Mainebill

    Mainebill Wild Bill

  17. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random nobody...

  18. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    If you are selling that one for EF-45 money, going by the photos, I am a buyer. If the coin is in a 45 holder, it's a crack-out candidate.

    I consistently under grade these coins, espcially the pieces that the experts call EF. I think these coins most go from AU to VF when they are in circulation and are never in EF. This one is definely an AU.

    Here are some photos from the Heritage auction site, both PCGS graded.

    EF-45, Old Green Label

    1916 St Lib 45 O.jpg 1916 St Lib 45 R.jpg

    AU-55

    1916 St Lib 55 O.jpg 1916 St Lib 55 R.jpg
     
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2019
  19. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    This is one of the coins where every grading point is critical.
    While not MS it's also not XF.
    I think the consensus AU is correct. It's all a matter of is it
    50,53,55,58. The reverse is the stronger side so not 58. If both sides are added (53/58) and divided then I think AU 55. Even 50/58 would be in between 53 and 55, then it's a tough decision.
     
    Koincollector1 and Mr. Flute like this.
  20. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  21. Koincollector1

    Koincollector1 Active Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page