Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 3986092, member: 19165&quot;]Apparently I missed the accidental slab shot, so I&#039;m coming to this fresh: </p><p><br /></p><p>Strike: For a first year issue, this coin seems to be missing details. I&#039;m going to say this is from a later die state rather than a true weak strike, but the overall &quot;softness&quot; is going to hurt the grade. </p><p><br /></p><p>Luster: I really don&#039;t see any luster, in either set of pics. This is *really* going to hurt the grade. </p><p><br /></p><p>Eye Appeal: It appears to have attractive, original patina. The coin is BN, but in a nice way. </p><p><br /></p><p>Contact Marks/Wear: My first reaction to this coin was AU, mostly due to the lackluster appearance. However, I really don&#039;t see any flattening of the high points. I don&#039;t actually think there is wear. I don&#039;t see major contact marks, but I do see quite a few smaller marks. There&#039;s some weird marks across CENT. </p><p><br /></p><p>All this is driving me to... 62BN? I could see this being a point off plus or minus, but I think 62 feels like the right grade.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in