Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 3257532, member: 19165&quot;]I honestly don&#039;t see signs of wear on this coin. Thus, I don&#039;t think it deserves an AU. </p><p><br /></p><p>I also, honestly, don&#039;t see mirrors strong enough for any sort of PL consideration. </p><p><br /></p><p>What I do see are fields and devices plagued by an enormous amount of very small tick-marks. There aren&#039;t any huge marks in obvious places, but there are a vast array of small little marks all over the faces of the coin. This absolutely *kills* the grade. </p><p><br /></p><p>The strike is average, the luster is meh, and the eye appeal isn&#039;t really there. All this combines to a coin that, yeah, technically it is uncirculated.... but it has had a hard life. You could argue 62, you could argue 61..... But really, this coin is one of those who doesn&#039;t deserve a huge premium. 61 is a fair grade.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in