Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BertJones, post: 2671140, member: 74696&quot;]Although not part of the op&#039;s question, I can not agree with the VAM 24 id. Date positioning is wrong among other things. Hard to tell for sure from the pictures but I would venture to say it is either a VAM 6 or 23.</p><p>However, Paddy&#039;s grade may be closer than mine. I sometimes have difficulty balancing the remaining feature definition versus degree of surface contact to arrive at the same grade as the TPG&#039;s[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in