Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 8222724, member: 37839&quot;]Ok, this is a strange one.&nbsp; Those of you that said 66+, and those who said 67 are both right.&nbsp; How so?&nbsp; When I owned it the first time, in 2016, it was in an NGC 66+* holder.&nbsp; Then, I sold it to a dealer in California.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;Evidently, he submitted it for crossover minimum grade 67 to PCGS.&nbsp; It got the upgrade, as you can see below.&nbsp; Recently, I rebought the coin, as it was one of my all-time favorite Morgans.&nbsp; The color, in hand, is really beautiful, with very even light golden toning.</p><p><br /></p><p>I rebought it as a 67, for much more money, but having sold my 1893s this past year, it was not a hardship.&nbsp; 1898o is rare in 67 grade, as there are only 346 graded by PCGS, and none higher.&nbsp;&nbsp; As was pointed out, it is a weakly struck date.&nbsp; This coin is comparatively well struck.&nbsp; I am sending it to Albanese, to go for a green or gold bean, to vindicate the grade, and to make up for the star grade that it had for color, and high eye appeal.</p><p><br /></p><p>OK, here it is in the holder:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1444435[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in