GTG 1893-O Morgan Dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ToughCOINS, Jul 29, 2019.

?

Guess the grade of this 1893-O Morgan

  1. AU58

  2. MS60

  3. MS61

  4. MS62

  5. Details - Cleaned

  6. Counterfeit

  7. Altered Surfaces

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    I can see that as a straight grade too. As being market acceptable This pic the surfaces look more natural but the coin has obviously been dipped and to me is very close to being overdipped in hand I may feel differently but that was my read on the pics
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Late to this party, but the NGC grade looks right on. The coin was obviously dipped, and that did dull the luster a bit. However, were it not for the muted luster, the coin is a clear slider—AU 58 to MS 62.
     
  4. Ike Skywalker

    Ike Skywalker Well-Known Member

    I voted AU58 before seeing the coin, so I feel good now. :happy:
     
    LA_Geezer and Randy Abercrombie like this.
  5. GenX Enthusiast

    GenX Enthusiast Forensic grammatician

    Yes! Logic prevails!
     
  6. Ike Skywalker

    Ike Skywalker Well-Known Member

    Well, I meant to say that I voted before I saw the slabbed coin. ;)
     
    Johndoe2000$ likes this.
  7. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Actually, the photos I posted under-represent the coin. After working harder on realism, the following are much closer . . .

    1.00-1893-o-1.jpg 1.00-1893-o-2.jpg 1.00-1893-o-3.jpg
     
  8. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Looking at those pictures, the coin may have been dipped, but not heavily. These pictures are much more illustrative. There is luster still present. Know what? With these pictures, I don’t think the coin has circulated. I think it has had heavy bag storage contact, and I believe that it is low grade MS—as in MS 61.
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2019
    ToughCOINS likes this.
  9. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Very much what I was thinking . . .
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  10. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Have to agree here, I'm not seeing the rub. I stand by my 61 guess.

    Pretty significant difference in value there... might be worth resubmitting.
     
  11. Lembeck13

    Lembeck13 Active Member

    Given the mint, MS 61.
     
  12. LA_Geezer

    LA_Geezer Well-Known Member

    I thought so, too, but didn't vote. Too rich for me at any grade above AU58 anyway.
     
    Evan8 likes this.
  13. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    I voted 58 before seeing. Lack of luster and wear are what has me staying low.
     
  14. buckeye73

    buckeye73 Well-Known Member

    Another person late to the party...I was at AU58 to MS 61 before seeing the reveal and was not at all surprised to see AU 58. The New Orleans Mint usually produced weak strikes coupled with tired dies. The bag marks apparently contributed to the market grade given by the TPG.
     
  15. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    I vote a late 58 without peeking.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page