Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CamaroDMD, post: 7722944, member: 5233&quot;]I used to think this way but once I studied it more...I found it doesn&#039;t make sense.&nbsp; Lets forget about Morgan&#039;s...lets talk about a totally different series but it&#039;s not just a Morgan issue.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1922-D Lincoln Cent is notorious for bad strikes due to the extreme age of the dies used.&nbsp; They are mushy.&nbsp; Not one single coin from that production was made to the same quality or strike as say...a 1912 Lincoln.&nbsp; They are COMPLETELY different coins with COMPLETELY different characteristics.&nbsp; You can&#039;t fairly evaluate them the same way.</p><p><br /></p><p>The same is true for the Morgan Dollar series.&nbsp; A few dates standout and are uniquely nice (1880-S is one of them).&nbsp; A few dates standout as being uniquely bad (1892-O comes to mind) and the majority are somewhere in between.&nbsp; With the outliers...you have to treat them special because they are different coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in