GTG: 1893 Isabella 25¢ - You vs NGC

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Beefer518, Sep 25, 2017.

  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I hope you understand that the specific reason why I graded this coin AU58 was that the reverse fields bear hairlines that have to be from circulation. It had nothing to do with the weak details from the strike.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    And myself the same reason as Lehigh, I saw the the same lines. But I am glad you are happy with the results, Congratulations.
     
  4. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Here's a similar PCGS MS-63. As you can see, the toning breaks make it look like a 58, but I agree with PCGS on their grade. This would be an AU by EAC standards. IMG_2036.JPG
     
  5. Old Coin Dawg

    Old Coin Dawg Active Member

    Lets get it right OLD GRUMPY GUYS rule
     
    green18 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page