GTG 1892 Columbian Half Dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Charles Ruge, Jan 31, 2021.

  1. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I knew it. It has to market for that, just look at it.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    The Columbian is a very difficult coin to grade in my opinion. What looks like rub on the cheek and hair is almost always just a relatively weak strike. This coin has very clean fields, and is almost mark free. I think it borders on 66, and in a way I'm surprised it didn't, maybe the imperfect toning hurt it? (ie; the line in the toning gives it negative eye appeal?)
     
    ddddd and LRC-Tom like this.
  4. LRC-Tom

    LRC-Tom Been around the block...

    You beat me to the point I was about to make. I was torn between AU-58 and MS-65, for these reasons.
     
  5. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I do think that line hurts it a bit. That was what I suggested originally (although I penalized the coin too much for it).
     
    Beefer518 likes this.
  6. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    I agree. The Columbian half dollar is tough to grade. What looks like a rub on the cheek might be due to a less than perfect strike.

    I bought this one from a dealer who submitted it twice to PCGS for an upgrade beyond MS-63 in 1994. He gave up and I paid him MS-64 money for it.

    ColumbianO.JPG ColumbianR.JPG

    This one was stored on the little pouch you see here for many years. It's still a raw coin. I collected it for the "issue pouch." The pouch was really a third party add-on at the 1893 Exposition.

    1892 Columbian Expo pouch.jpg


    The coin really looks like this. The first photo was overexposed because of the pouch. Yes, there is a finger print on the reverse.

    1893 Columbian pouch O.jpg 1893 Columbian pouch R.jpg
     
    bradgator2, Beefer518 and ddddd like this.
  7. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    @johnmilton I think your '92 has a good shot at 65 by today's standards. From your images, I can't see why it wouldn't. Nice coins, and I love the pouch!
     
    johnmilton likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page