GTG - 1889 - O Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Scott J, May 25, 2021.

?

GTG

  1. AU 55

    2 vote(s)
    9.1%

  2. AU 58

    1 vote(s)
    4.5%

  3. MS 60

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  4. MS 61

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  5. MS 62

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  6. MS 63

    10 vote(s)
    45.5%

  7. MS 64

    9 vote(s)
    40.9%

  8. MS 65

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%

  9. Other

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Page 2 of 2
  1. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Undergraded.
     
    eddiespin, May 28, 2021
    #21 + Quote Reply
    Scott J likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I agree. But because the grade is lower than I expected I wonder if the toning is hiding marks from being visible in the photo...marks that are apparent in hand.
     
    CamaroDMD, May 28, 2021
    #22 + Quote Reply
    Scott J, COOPER12 and Morgandude11 like this.
  4. Scott J

    Scott J Well-Known Member

    Tough to tell, but it does look like it may be a 64, maybe I'll take @Morgandude11 s advice and dip it.
     
    Scott J, May 28, 2021
    #23 + Quote Reply
  5. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    Quite a few marks on the neck, and one a bit deeper on the cheek...all pretty visible. I think it's fairly graded.
    If the toning looks like the reveal pic, I wouldn't dip it, I'll take that over blast white. JMPO.
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2021
    longshot, May 28, 2021
    #24 + Quote Reply
    Scott J likes this.
  6. Mac McDonald

    Mac McDonald Well-Known Member

    I agree...don't care for it...but to each their own, as a lot of collectors (and prices/values among that group) go nuts for this type of "rainbow" (psychadelic) toning...even heard there's a major TPG that favors/rewards it.
     
    Mac McDonald, Jun 1, 2021
    #25 + Quote Reply
Page 2 of 2
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page