GTG 1888 for the morgan date set!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by mrweaseluv, Aug 5, 2021.

  1. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    I'll hit you with GTG but will share most of the label as it's part of the reason i got it.. will also be a part of my newest miniset.. the great hoards set :D
    1888fblk.jpg 1888.jpg 1888r.jpg
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest

    to hide this ad.
  3. Razz

    Razz Critical Thinker

  4. Rheingold

    Rheingold Well-Known Member

  5. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 Casual Collector / error expert "in Training "

  6. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    The impaired luster makes me lean to MS62.
    longshot likes this.
  7. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  8. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    It's between MS63-MS64. Since it's a Morgan, I'll go with MS64.
  9. LRC-Tom

    LRC-Tom Been around the block...

    Looks 64 to me.
  10. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  11. David Betts

    David Betts Elle Mae Clampett cruising with Dad

  12. RogerC

    RogerC Active Member

  13. Mac McDonald

    Mac McDonald Well-Known Member

    63...but given it's provenance may be 64 (or more). Luster, while maybe not "blast white," looks good to mutes it.
  14. Two Dogs

    Two Dogs Well-Known Member

  15. RogerC

    RogerC Active Member

    I based my opinion of MS 62 using Coin World's "Making The Grade" definition.
    "Uncirculated. Numerous contact marks on cheek, neck, and fields but none that are heavy or disfiguring. Luster is original, strike is sharp".
    My question is, how many is "numerous"?
    mrweaseluv and Two Dogs like this.
  16. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

  17. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    63 here, but I will only guess once.
    Evan Saltis likes this.
  18. Evan Saltis

    Evan Saltis College Dorm Collector Supporter

    Must have had a connection problem?
    We read your guess. Multiple times :D usually it's me with the internet problems.

    I think this coin is a 64 but maybe 63. I really like it but I'm not too picky.
  19. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Looks like it is right between grades. Based on the usual bagmarks, I will go 63. I don’t think its provenance is sufficient to bring it up much higher. Nice coin.
  20. capthank

    capthank Well-Known Member

  21. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    Well I agree with most of you.. I place her at a 63 63+.. the grade they gave her however I think a bit low...
    1888f.jpg 1888fr.jpg
  22. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    That does seem low...I blame the photographer. :)
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page