GTG: 1887 Morgan, 1897 Morgan and 1904-O Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by jtlee321, Jun 7, 2022.

  1. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Hey guys, I've got another guess the grade. I have not done one of these for a while, so I thought I would put up these 3 Morgan Dollars I've recently picked up. Any feedback you want to include is always appreciated.

    Up first is an 1887 Morgan:

    1887-Morgan-Dollar-Obverse-JLNP.jpg 1887-Morgan-Dollar-Reverse-JLNP.jpg

    Now the 1897 Morgan: (The holder has some pretty bad scuffs near Liberty's ear and back towards her hat. Also the thing near the eagle's eye on the reverse is some rubbery stuff from the gasket in the holder.)

    1897-Morgan-Dollar-Obverse-JLNP.jpg 1897-Morgan-Dollar-Reverse-JLNP.jpg

    And finally the 1904-O Morgan:

    1904-O-Morgan-Dollar-Obverse-JLNP.jpg 1904-O-Morgan-Dollar-Reverse-JLNP.jpg
     
    Tamaracian, mrweaseluv, dwhiz and 2 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. tpsadler

    tpsadler Numismatist

    MS 64+ on the 97
    MS 65 on the 04

    Very nice coins
     
    jtlee321 and SensibleSal66 like this.
  4. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I'm going to say MS 64 on all three
    ...all are fairly mark free (no major disturbances in the fields or on the cheek) and lustrous...I could see any of them being 65s but think you found a nice group of PQ 64s (with at least a few in older holders)
     
    Morgandude11, dwhiz, jtlee321 and 2 others like this.
  5. Omegaraptor

    Omegaraptor Gobrecht/Longacre Enthusiast

    If you had a 1940-O Morgan that would be a truly rare find!

    I will go with 64 on the first two and 65 on the 1904-O.
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  6. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Ha ha!! I fat fingered it got the numbers transposed. Thanks for catching it and letting me know. I got it changed.
     
  7. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Any guess on the 1887?
     
  8. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    1887: MS64
    1897: MS65
    1904-O: MS65

    Your photography is so good that I find myself needing to restrain myself when participating in your GTG threads, I always guess high.
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  9. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    2 65
    1904 66
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2022
    jtlee321 likes this.
  10. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

    1887 OBV MS65 REV MS65 Details - MS65 details
    1897 OBV MS65 REV MS65 - MS65
    1904 O OBV MS65 REV MS66 - MS65
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  11. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    64+
    65
    64+
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  12. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    65
    64+
    64+
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  13. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Ha ha!! I appreciate the compliment. I try to shoot them to represent exactly how they look in hand.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  14. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    1887- MS 64
    1897-MS 64 (close to 65, but just a few bagmarks short of it).
    1904o- MS 65 high in grade. A few facial marks shy of 66.

    All 3 are high eye appeal coins.
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  15. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    He is right, Justin. Your coin photography rocks. It captures the actual look of a coin attractively, and accurately without artificially juicing them.
    No matter how I try, by either my iPhone 13, or my Nikon Mirrorless $4000 camera, my photos of coins is awful. I do landscape and nature photography well, but my coin photography is for crap.
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  16. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I appreciate it! I actually started out with landscape photography as well. Then I got into sports photography and eventually coin photography. It's all a journey of learning. I still struggle with Lincoln Cents, I just can't capture the luster and toning. Morgan Dollars are very easy on the other hand. If you ever want some pointers or have questions, I am more than happy to help you out.
     
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  17. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    my eyes aren't up to real grading tonight, but I would happily add any one of those to my date set so will agree with those above saying 64-65 on all 3... Very pretty morgans :D
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  18. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    I'll let this one run until tomorrow evening.
     
  19. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

    all 65s
     
    jtlee321 likes this.
  20. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Ok, it's time for the reveal!! A lot of you have very good eye's for grading as a lot of you did well. The 1887 and 1904-O are actually in an old photograde holder I had never heard of, but the grading felt very accurate if not on the slightly conservative side. I was excited to pick them up. The 1897 is in an old PCGS rattler, I just can't pass these up if they have a nice looking coin in them.

    1887-Morgan-Dollar-INGS-MS-65-Slab-Front.jpg

    1897-Morgan-Dollar-PCGS-MS-64-Rattler-Slab-Front.jpg

    1904-O-Morgan-Dollar-INGS-MS-65-Slab-Front.jpg
     
  21. Mac McDonald

    Mac McDonald Well-Known Member

    Wow...all quite nice...would be glad to own any of them...!
     
    tpsadler and jtlee321 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page