I took a shot at this coin as the seller didn't have any other coins listed and I knew their pictures wouldn't do it justice. Ended up being just stunning in hand Old ANACS Holder.
Regardless of whatever number a TPG gave it, for me it has ‘the look’. Most appealing Morgan i’ve Seen in a long time.
Yep, that's a beaut. I went 63 PL. Beautiful luster, I always love gold rim toning, and the many marks are not distracting from the general loveliness of the coin. I'm not sure everyone would judge it prooflike. I think there's a small chance it wasn't graded so. I might just be tired.
I went 63PL. Normally I like higher grades for Morgans, but this one is a beauty. Might make 64. Nice find
63 PL. Nice coin, with a fair amount of Cameo. A little baggy for a 64 or 65, but a really nice prooflike example.
63PL....too many dings for a higher grade. IMO Nice looking for sure. Is that enough to get a point bump for "possible" market grading??? (if such things exist)...
62 PL My grade is based on it being an old Anacs and what looks to be baggy surfaces and cheek area. I could see this going 63 PL nowadays, but that is no certainty.
I voted 62PL which is what I think is on the slab. I personally like it at 63PL but I think as @ddddd mentioned. The older holder and many tick marks and few carbon spots landed at 62. I have a 1904-O that had a similar look that Anacs gave 61 due to many tick marks all over the coin.
Going to call it! @kSigSteve @ddddd got it at 62 PL.i think it got brought down for the carbon spots, but it's one of the cleanest cheeks I own! I think I got lucky even at that grade. I made an offer and bought this for $67 after shipping.