Do your best with the reverse photo, it's not good I know. I'll tell you why once we're done guessing. The Obverse is a clean shot and a very good representation of the coin.
Ok, I was at a show and almost bought this one for $1,200. Glad I didn't. I thought I posted a thread last year on this coin when I was at the show and had it in hand. Just looked up the thread and it was last April so a few of you looked at it already. Anyways, the luster was great on this coin but too baggy for me to be in a 65 holder. I gave it a 63 back then but now would give it a 64 based off more experience I have now.
Totally. The GSA holder probably too. The thing is, I wouldn't pay 65 money for this coin now. Glad I didn't back then.
Looks like VAM-3 to me but thats are far as I can eliminate without the coin in hand. I feel VAM-4 is more noticable.
I'd never touch that as a 65, never!! I'd call it a 63+ on a good day. I know it's a CC and a GSA and those are given a little extra love by NGC, but man...