GTG - 1885-O Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by BigTee44, Mar 14, 2018.

  1. KevinM

    KevinM Well-Known Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. GoldBug999

    GoldBug999 Well-Known Member

  4. Ron W

    Ron W Member

  5. Steven Hufschmidt

    Steven Hufschmidt Active Member

  6. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

  7. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

  8. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    At NGC right now for grading. Will know within a week or so
     
    heavycam.monstervam likes this.
  9. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Definite 66 minimum. More likely a 66+. If it had a stronger strike, it would be a lock on 67. Absolutely beautiful, clean coin, with tons of luster. So, I will go with 66+.
     
  10. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    65 is my guess. But a 66 wouldn't surprise me.
     
  11. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    That southern belle makes the cut, MS67.
     
  12. Bman33

    Bman33 Well-Known Member

    My gut told me 67 when I first saw it with a quick glance. Then I read everyones comments and i could see 66 especially the reverse. I will stick with my gut though, come on 67!
     
  13. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    This makes me sad 94D7A4C6-EDB6-41A8-A977-7E49AB2CD01D.png
     
  14. Steven Hufschmidt

    Steven Hufschmidt Active Member

    If you want to sell let me know we can work something out in $$$ or trade.
     
  15. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    Wow, it IS nice coin though.
    How much was it???
    If you don't mind me asking
     
  16. Don P

    Don P Active Member

    Same here, 65+
     
  17. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    Your pic of coin in slab is very different from the one in the OP. The marks on her cheeks are much more visible and the disturbance in the right obverse field is much larger. I'd say NGC got it right.
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  18. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    I don’t believe my pictures are hiding anything.
    B2C1605F-2D6D-4D76-A614-FC5836D92976.jpeg 0B8629CE-DB32-4198-A3D2-1067749ECEDA.jpeg
     
  19. JPeace$

    JPeace$ Coinaholic

    @BigTee44 , I didn't mean to offend. After seeing the two photos side by side, I'll just say they are a little more noticeable in the pictures of the slab.

    Did you get the grade/result you were hoping for or expecting?
     
  20. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    I wasn't offended. I just thought the two pictures I had did a good job of showing any blemishes. I just think a 65 was harsh... even a 65+ would have been more fitting. I might try and have him send that one to CAC.

    This coin was sent in for a local friend. He only wanted to send in anything 65 or better. 63,64,65 were the results of his Morgans. Even the 85-O in 66 would have made the submission worth it. Looks like a wash for him this time.
     
    JPeace$ likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page