Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 7582280, member: 37839&quot;]Okay, a few facts for people who are not that familiar with PL Morgans, which this is.&nbsp; First, there are two types of PL and DMPL Morgans—those with a deep cameo effect, and those that are extremely reflective, with more of a satiny finish, and tons of frost. This is the latter-it is extremely satiny, and at the same time, has deep mirrors.&nbsp; Second, these type of coins DO NOT fall into a “count the bagmarks” situation.&nbsp; The slightest nick, contact mark, luster break, or toning marks are grossly exaggerated by the extremely reflective surfaces.&nbsp; Based on my considerable experience with Morgans, this coin is grossly undergraded.&nbsp; The majority that had it at 64 to 65 are, in my opinion, quite correct.&nbsp; In hand, the coin shows beautifully.&nbsp; Also, without doing videos, it is virtually impossible to photograph them and capture the coin accurately.&nbsp; I did the best I could, given the circumstances.&nbsp; This coin should be a 65, but I am sending it to New Jersey for the bean.&nbsp; It is certain to get a green bean, and IMHO, likely to get a gold one.&nbsp; That would vindicate undergraded, far more than a resubmit to PCGS.&nbsp; Third, as regards dipping, that would remove a lot of the desirable frost.&nbsp; If one does not like the toning (I do like it), don’t buy it, as it would destroy the satin surfaces of this PL coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here ya go with the reveal.&nbsp; Totally insane in terms of grade:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1306664[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in