Nice coin, lovely toning! I think this Morgan graded either 63 PL or 64 no-PL. ANACS used to be strict with Morgans, but more lenient with the PL designation.
This is tricky. I know Old ANACS was a bit lax with the PL, so I think it probably got PL (although it might not get it if resubmitted today). I went with 64 PL. I love the color on this one, very nice purples and blues.
I like the colors. If they detailed her for that, they're just letting their imagination run wild again. Don't give it a second thought. My rationale for not gemming her is she's just got a little too much interference going on for gem.
I voted 64 PL It's somewhere in the 63-64 range based on the hits/marks and I'm speculating PL based on the older standards (likely not today, although a different photo/video change my mind).
I said 63 not pl. it’s close to the designation but not quite I thought. And there’s some pretty significant bag marks
This is where I'm leaning, too. Both field and cheek are a little scuffy on the obverse. 82-S is not as common in PL as 80-S or 81-S, and I think this falls a little short.
I think you're misinterpreting the slab scratches, I'll try to get a clear picture tonight. I was attempting to show the reflectiveness of the coin in this image.
