GTG: 1882 O/S Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Santinidollar, Jul 7, 2020.

  1. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Have fun! Graded by NGC.

    F9465CD2-FCD7-4881-A6E9-FD080218314C.jpeg 66596B2D-79DB-4AA1-AA57-C1AC2A344257.jpeg
     
    capthank likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Derp, derp, derp!

  4. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    I’m inclined to think it’s a 55. I think it was netted down from a possibly cleaning due to the scratches. The parallel marks seem like it had a wipe in that direction. Not sure if it’s enough to details the coin so I am thinking it at least was netted to 55.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  5. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat dave700x -1883 O nut

    I'm going to say 58. Very tough coin in MS condition...
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  6. thomas mozzillo

    thomas mozzillo Well-Known Member

  7. QuintupleSovereign

    QuintupleSovereign Well-Known Member

    Agreed with AU-58.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  8. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    Lol
     
    CoinCorgi likes this.
  9. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Derp, derp, derp!

    What? We're talking whisky right?
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  10. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 61 ...I think it's UNC but on the lower end of the grade spectrum based on the fields and cheek being pretty rough
     
  11. toned_morgan

    toned_morgan Toning Lover

    I'm saying MS63 and I'm going to put my doubts on a soft strike.
     
    Morgandude11 and Santinidollar like this.
  12. BlackberryPie

    BlackberryPie I like pie

  13. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    AU58/MS61 It is a classic slider. Honestly, I can’t tell from the pictures. Either it is very baggy, or there are slight wear marks in the fields and devices. I will guess it as a 61.
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  14. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  15. jgrinz

    jgrinz Senior Member

  16. bradgator2

    bradgator2 Supporter! Supporter

  17. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

  18. CommemHalfScrub

    CommemHalfScrub Active Member

  19. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    58, but it's really hard to tell from the pictures if all those scuffs that should be accompanied by worn luster really are. The obverse field was scuffed hard enough that this could actually grade 60.
     
    kSigSteve and Santinidollar like this.
  20. chascat

    chascat Well-Known Member

  21. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    And behind door No. 2.....

    4D5295F6-98BB-4D92-BE5E-E319263E8D1A.jpeg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page