Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
GTG 1882 cc & Vam
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="CircCam, post: 2999807, member: 85675"]That I find impressive, I tried with the first pictures and got nowhere. </p><p><br /></p><p>I was thinking the luster was stronger in hand than the pictures showed... Darn nice 58 in a cool old holder in any case! </p><p><br /></p><p>Side question:</p><p><br /></p><p>Are (or were) TPG's known to mark coins AU just for muted luster in years that are known for it being stronger even without the presence of wear?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="CircCam, post: 2999807, member: 85675"]That I find impressive, I tried with the first pictures and got nowhere. I was thinking the luster was stronger in hand than the pictures showed... Darn nice 58 in a cool old holder in any case! Side question: Are (or were) TPG's known to mark coins AU just for muted luster in years that are known for it being stronger even without the presence of wear?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
GTG 1882 cc & Vam
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...