GTG: 1881cc Morgan Dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Morgandude11, Jul 30, 2021.


Grade, and comments

  1. MS 61

    0 vote(s)
  2. MS 62

    2 vote(s)
  3. MS 63

    0 vote(s)
  4. MS 64

    2 vote(s)
  5. MS 65

    10 vote(s)
  6. MS 66

    7 vote(s)
  7. MS 67

    1 vote(s)
  8. PL

    13 vote(s)
  9. DMPL

    2 vote(s)
  10. +

    4 vote(s)
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    You know the drill.

    7FF35AA0-23D5-45E4-88E6-9AB7C6FB754C.jpeg 83429076-3B3A-44FB-AEE4-2FEBB2B5B082.jpeg
    potty dollar 1878 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest

    to hide this ad.
  3. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    very sweet.. I said 65+ PL If it was any other date morgan I would call it 66-67 easy.. as for PL hard to call from pics but it doesn't seem to have that deep deep mirror for dmpl.. Beauty of a coin :D
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2021
  4. stldanceartist

    stldanceartist Minister of Silly Walks Supporter

    Went with 66PL. Kind of a semi-educated guess, honestly. Let's see where it ends up. Probably a gorgeous coin in hand.
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  5. jrw711

    jrw711 Member

    66ms PL
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  6. thejaxcollector

    thejaxcollector Active Member

    What a beauty! 66DMPL
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  7. jrw711

    jrw711 Member

    64ms PL. very nice Morgan
  8. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat dave700x -1883 O nut

    64. could be PL but not based on these images...That X on the cheek kinda kills it.
  9. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 Casual Collector / error expert "in Training "

  10. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    It is a luster break. The coin has light Golden toning on both sides.
  11. COOPER12

    COOPER12 Well-Known Member

    I will say 64 pl cheek might be luster break but looks like its in the cheek in a few spots.
  12. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Luster breaks, and certainly not anything to take the coin out of gem status. As I said above, there is light Golden toning, and a few luster breaks, but 64? Not exactly. :)
  13. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I went 65 without blinking my eye. Might even be a 66. Either way it’s PL to my eye. Very nice coin.
    Morgandude11 likes this.
  14. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    First impression 66, though enlarging the pics does show something on the cheek that might ding the grade a bit....somewhat PL, but the obverse might be borderline for the 66, no PL, but very attractive whatever it grades, I like Morgans that don't look freshly dipped.
  15. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

  16. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    I went with MS66+ PL. Morgans are notoriously over graded (imo).
  17. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Active Member

    MS65 DMPL wouldn't be surprised if MS64 due to that mark on the cheek though
  18. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

  19. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title] Supporter

    I’m at MS65+ PL. it’s a real stunner
  20. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Ok, not much traffic on this one. Did not grade PL. I think the reverse is definitely PL, but I am not convinced that the obverse is PL. I do think it is conservatively graded, given that it is an OGH. It could easily have gone 66. It looks really attractive in hand, with the light Golden toning on the obverse and reverse.

  21. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I said 65 maybe 66 but I think the TPG left off the PL. In the original photos the reverse is definitely PL and the obverse is sure close enough.
    Hookman and Morgandude11 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page