Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Virginian, post: 5010153, member: 27579&quot;]I think he is off base.&nbsp; That ding will lower the grade.&nbsp; But I cannot possibly see how that takes it into the &quot;details&quot; category.&nbsp; I have a ton of graded Morgans from MS63 through MS67 from PCGS, ICG, NGC . . .&nbsp;&nbsp; .&nbsp; Including several 1881-S&#039;s of which there are a <b><u>lot</u></b> of high end examples out there (I have an MS-67 1881-S, and at various times have owned other MS-67s).&nbsp; These coins often have dings like that . . . this one is just in an unfortunate place.</p><p><br /></p><p>I really like the clean cheek and neck on the obverse.&nbsp; But this one looks MS64 to me, or maybe MS65 with luck - especially with NGC.&nbsp; In my experience, PCGS is noticably tougher on Morgans.&nbsp; Wouldn&#039;t quibble with either grade.&nbsp; The obverse fields are not clean enough for me to go higher.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in