Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CircCam, post: 3295626, member: 85675&quot;]The fields were very reflective, but less so due to the toning on it.&nbsp; The coin is definitely PL, but I agree yours is more attractive.</p><p><br /></p><p>I can count on one hand the number of coins I’ve returned, but this is one.&nbsp; PL stuff is new to me and seems very challenging to photograph so I don’t blame the seller, but I wasn’t expecting the toning to be so dark.&nbsp; I went to the dealer and they had the same coin in 64PL with a more marked up portrait but squeaky clean fields and it was a superior coin, but I’m gonna hold out for a higher end one.&nbsp; Thanks for all the guesses, I had already sent it back but was curious what you guys would think.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I think it is fairly graded as well, clean portrait with unhappy fields.&nbsp; There are prints I didn’t see in the seller photos as well, so when my initial reaction to the coin was wanting to crack it out and dip it which would only reveal more imperfections, I put her back in the envelope.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in