Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;charley, post: 25357783, member: 5372&quot;]Under&nbsp; UM in &quot;UNUM&quot; (and above the Eagle on Reverse).</p><p><br /></p><p>However, I don&#039;t give a darn, because the &quot;wipes&quot; could just as easily happened a the Mint, and the small dink (my description) is laughably trivial and also could have been a Mint issue. The Die Break itself certainly reflects that at that stage of the useful life, it is not unreasonable to assume the Mint enhancement of the Die. It is a little inconsistent that the UM and Eagle location would be the only areas to have a reflection of being only the result of being aggressively cleaned outside the Mint, and I, as a Grader, would not have detailed this piece on that alone.</p><p><br /></p><p>I note there is an appearance of graffiti under the U of PLURIBUS, (and on the Reverse above the Eagle feathers) but only because of the photo, which is certainly quite larger than a 5-7X examination. I would again consider this a trivial issue, as I would the counting mark and the one very minor hit...so? Maybe a slight downgrade, but a Details, no. Absolutely not, for this piece.</p><p><br /></p><p>No doubt maybe it was dipped somewhere along the line. And??</p><p><br /></p><p>It is an OUTSTANDING example and I would have been all over it in a Details Holder especially considering it could be had for less Wampum.</p><p><br /></p><p>OUTSTANDING EXAMPLE!</p><p>Good on you.</p><p><br /></p><p>This has been another Charley Talk.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in