Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
GTG: 1871 Seated Dollar
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2051317, member: 28107"]Although some may colloquially use the terms interchangeably, as the term is widely used and has been accepted in the numismatic community, the processes are distinct. Dipping refers to the use of an acidic solution to remove a thin layer of metal on the coin's surface. When done properly it, the luster should survive and in most cases, the results should be market acceptable. Improper dipping typically results either from improper rinsing (leaving a film or residue that typically turns a brownish color) or overdipping (also known as a coin having been "dipped out") to the point that the coin is stripped of luster. In that context, typically the resulting impairment of luster is usually different between cleaning (often a dull, dark look) and dipping (often just stripped, completely lifeless, white looking), although in some cases I agree there could be ambiguity in a limited number of cases where there is no evidence of mechanical damage (i.e. wiping or other hairlines from the cleaning).</p><p><br /></p><p>With regards to your initial post, I may very well be misinterpreting what you wrote. I understood you to say that the lack of patina in the recesses/contact marks and the rest of the fields is dispositive of cleaning. I disagree. If a coin was never acquired a patina (less likely here but included for completeness) or if a coin was dipped so as to remove the silver oxide (i.e. toning) from the surface of the coin, then the marks would similarly be devoid of color. A properly dipped coin will appear blast white, as the coin you linked shows. I have no problem with calling it a properly dipped piece. My point is that it is the <u>luster</u> and not the coloration necessarily that is dispositive. A coin without a patina may very well have been cleaned, but it could have also been altered by other means.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2051317, member: 28107"]Although some may colloquially use the terms interchangeably, as the term is widely used and has been accepted in the numismatic community, the processes are distinct. Dipping refers to the use of an acidic solution to remove a thin layer of metal on the coin's surface. When done properly it, the luster should survive and in most cases, the results should be market acceptable. Improper dipping typically results either from improper rinsing (leaving a film or residue that typically turns a brownish color) or overdipping (also known as a coin having been "dipped out") to the point that the coin is stripped of luster. In that context, typically the resulting impairment of luster is usually different between cleaning (often a dull, dark look) and dipping (often just stripped, completely lifeless, white looking), although in some cases I agree there could be ambiguity in a limited number of cases where there is no evidence of mechanical damage (i.e. wiping or other hairlines from the cleaning). With regards to your initial post, I may very well be misinterpreting what you wrote. I understood you to say that the lack of patina in the recesses/contact marks and the rest of the fields is dispositive of cleaning. I disagree. If a coin was never acquired a patina (less likely here but included for completeness) or if a coin was dipped so as to remove the silver oxide (i.e. toning) from the surface of the coin, then the marks would similarly be devoid of color. A properly dipped coin will appear blast white, as the coin you linked shows. I have no problem with calling it a properly dipped piece. My point is that it is the [U]luster[/U] and not the coloration necessarily that is dispositive. A coin without a patina may very well have been cleaned, but it could have also been altered by other means.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
GTG: 1871 Seated Dollar
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...