Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Publius2, post: 7941203, member: 105571&quot;]Time for the reveal.&nbsp; Thanks for the favorable comments - I agree that it is attractive. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1374601[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Poll results:</p><p><br /></p><p>AU58 - 5 votes - 28%</p><p>MS62 - 6 votes - 33%</p><p>MS63 - 3 votes - 17%</p><p>MS64 - 4 votes - 22%</p><p><br /></p><p>I thought this coin might generate this kind of diversity of opinion which is why I posted it.&nbsp; I am not the most skilled or astute at determining what is or is not a slider.&nbsp; Frankly, though, I didn&#039;t think this was an AU-63 when I bought it and I still don&#039;t.&nbsp; But I respect the alternate opinions of those that do.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a shot of the same variety 1833 LM-8 half dime PCGS MS-63 CAC from the Richard Meaney sales catalog of his complete Capped Bust Half Dime Die Marriage Registry Set Collection.&nbsp; Compare his undoubtedly finest to mine.&nbsp; I think mine is not too far inferior to his and supports my belief that my sample is not a slider.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks for playing!</p><p><br /></p><p>Note to Moderators:&nbsp; I can find no evidence of trademark or copyright protection on this catalog which was emailed to many potential bidders. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1374602[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in