Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Gtg 1827 large cent
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="beef1020, post: 2409504, member: 24544"]I agree with your frustration about the third party graders. I don't like them, don't use them, crack out all my coins, and could care less what grade they give coins I buy. </p><p><br /></p><p>However, this thread is a guess the grade thread, as in guess the grade TPGs gave the coin, and for that I think it's useful in helping people understand how TPGs grade coins. They use market grading, which as you point out is inherently inflationary for grades. They try to determine what they think the value of a certain coin is, and then assign the grade that will put the coin in the correct price range. I think this coin is probably a great example of that. It may very well be an AU coin, but it's got great original surfaces and spotless focal areas. Two qualities that make this a very nice and more valuable coin. </p><p><br /></p><p>Fully flushing out the grading, I tend to view TPG MS64 large cents as generally being MS60 by EAC standards. Let's assume this coin has wear, and it's really a choice EAC 55 coin. The preimium even EACers pay for choice coins over average may well put the choice 55 at the same price point as an average 60. The TPGs would then say this coin is MS64. Not saying I like the logic, but thats the idea behind market grading. I don't want to get into if it's right or wrong because EAC and TPG grades are really based on two very different systems and philosophies of grading, but I will say I prefer EAC philosophy as well.</p><p><br /></p><p>In terms of what EACers will pay, when I collected large cent by variety I found in general that the prices between CQR (auction results for EAC graded coins) and what slabbed coins brought was basically none. I had a late date 1847 graded xf40 by NGC which was really a choice vf 25 by EAC. CQR had the coin values at $75 while the price guides for slabbed coins had the xf40 around $70. That is market grading in action, as long as a collector understood at least one method of grading, they would be being the coin at basically the market value using either method. I know this doesn't hold for every coin in every situation, but I found it in general to be true most of the time.</p><p><br /></p><p>Last point, I am very hesitant to make the distinction between EAC AU and MS based on pictures. AU coins have some breaks in the luster at the highest points, MS coins don't, that the difference. AU coins don't have enough wear to 'flatten' any devices. This coin could have breaks in the luster, it could have complete luster with toning as seen on the high points. Without seeing this in hand I can't make the distinction.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="beef1020, post: 2409504, member: 24544"]I agree with your frustration about the third party graders. I don't like them, don't use them, crack out all my coins, and could care less what grade they give coins I buy. However, this thread is a guess the grade thread, as in guess the grade TPGs gave the coin, and for that I think it's useful in helping people understand how TPGs grade coins. They use market grading, which as you point out is inherently inflationary for grades. They try to determine what they think the value of a certain coin is, and then assign the grade that will put the coin in the correct price range. I think this coin is probably a great example of that. It may very well be an AU coin, but it's got great original surfaces and spotless focal areas. Two qualities that make this a very nice and more valuable coin. Fully flushing out the grading, I tend to view TPG MS64 large cents as generally being MS60 by EAC standards. Let's assume this coin has wear, and it's really a choice EAC 55 coin. The preimium even EACers pay for choice coins over average may well put the choice 55 at the same price point as an average 60. The TPGs would then say this coin is MS64. Not saying I like the logic, but thats the idea behind market grading. I don't want to get into if it's right or wrong because EAC and TPG grades are really based on two very different systems and philosophies of grading, but I will say I prefer EAC philosophy as well. In terms of what EACers will pay, when I collected large cent by variety I found in general that the prices between CQR (auction results for EAC graded coins) and what slabbed coins brought was basically none. I had a late date 1847 graded xf40 by NGC which was really a choice vf 25 by EAC. CQR had the coin values at $75 while the price guides for slabbed coins had the xf40 around $70. That is market grading in action, as long as a collector understood at least one method of grading, they would be being the coin at basically the market value using either method. I know this doesn't hold for every coin in every situation, but I found it in general to be true most of the time. Last point, I am very hesitant to make the distinction between EAC AU and MS based on pictures. AU coins have some breaks in the luster at the highest points, MS coins don't, that the difference. AU coins don't have enough wear to 'flatten' any devices. This coin could have breaks in the luster, it could have complete luster with toning as seen on the high points. Without seeing this in hand I can't make the distinction.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Gtg 1827 large cent
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...