Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by TypeCoin971793, Dec 4, 2017.
Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.
@TypeCoin971793 is right; this is the newest NGC holder (with the text on the left side).
Yes, that holder came out within the last year.
NGC has tightened grades in the last year or two, according to most analysts (conspiracy theories abound as to why). I think 64 is a fair grade, but we've gotten used to somewhat "gradeflated" grades. I would think, however, that 63 or 63+ would be absolutely warranted for this piece.
62 is ridiculous based on these pictures.
I'd be interested in what an old-time copper collector like @Conder101 might think of this coin?
So you're saying.... I should buy the coin and not the holder?
Man, you're a genius!
Exactly and it's a problem that they're aware of hence that hit piece they put out earlier this year that left a lot of relevant information out. They know that a lot of their best coins are being lost to cross overs leaving the less eye appealing ones and generic ones along with the over graded ones to sit in their holders. All of them have been tightening for a while, but with them in some cases it almost gives the feel of population control when it's so overly tight. Almost no one would bat an eye with that coin above in a 63 and most would probably consider it an upgrade candidate
Lovely, undergraded N-13. I'm a real fan of the circumferential cracks on Large Cents of this era. I got this one in an NGC 63 slab (from the same place you got yours ):
He took care of me on the price, which was good because I cracked it for these shots (I bought it to learn to shoot Mint State Large Cents) and it came back 62 when I resubmitted. We both figured that was closer to reality. Wish I'd waited to sell; these have near-doubled in price in ten years.
At 62, yours is a CAC Gold bean in the waiting.
Your coin has a lot of luster for an MS-62 by current TPG standards. Me likey!
I bought it from McCawley at a Baltimore show ten years ago. The luster was terrific, and I think the reason NGC overlooked a few extra nicks to give it MS63. Although they didn't the second time around.
In every other particular, I like your coin better. There is no justification whatsoever for it to be at 62; even if one docks the coin a grade for the somewhat dull surfaces - it's undoubtedly a Randall Hoard coin, and the surfaces are understandable - the result should be MS63 in my opinion. I would almost certainly throw "MS-63 minus the cost of regrading" at it, although the intent would be to leave it in the current slab and send it to CAC.
I'd sell it as a 64 and the big dealer would probably get it into a 65 slab! Only "real" distraction is the spotty obverse. I opened two of the examples on Ebay and they suck when compared to your coin which has full mint luster and very few marks. Unfortunately, IMO, its color is not natural.
Rather than trying to show the large corrosion spotted PCGS MS-63 cent in one of the links, let's take the 1818 coin above. This coin is OVERGRADED as an MS-63. The original luster is rubbed off the high points and there are corrosion spots.
That's my opinion - hope it makes sense.
I did some reading on the Randall Hoard, and it seems that the vast majority had splotchy brown color. I think the splotchiness on my coin confirms its provenance which adds to its character. I could be wrong, but that is my figuring.
Separate names with a comma.