Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jtlee321, post: 2761521, member: 73983&quot;]This is an interesting one.&nbsp; I see some remnants of luster peaking out from protected areas of the stars on the obverse and a little around some of the devices on the reverse.&nbsp; This leads me to believe that all of what looks like wear is not necessarily wear but a combination of weak strike and wear.&nbsp; I&#039;m thinking that the wear on this is in the VF range. </p><p><br /></p><p>The surfaces are far from original, they were certainly cleaned up, not exactly a details kind of cleaning though.&nbsp; Just enough to remove surface debris and to brighten the coin up.&nbsp; So eye appeal is pretty low on this one.</p><p><br /></p><p>The combination of weak strike with the fairly heavy wear make it look more worn than it truly is.&nbsp; Eye appeal after the brightening hurts it causing a net grade.&nbsp; I&#039;d say it was probably net graded by ANACS as a F-15 with a possible technical grade of VF-20.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in