Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 8314019, member: 4920&quot;]That doesn&#039;t say much for their conservation service after they&#039;re the ones who graded it <i>before </i>the conservation service.</p><p><br /></p><p>But it&#039;s word games, right? It&#039;s what&#039;s &quot;market acceptable,&quot; however to them, and not necessarily to us? It&#039;s &quot;cleaned,&quot; if we do it, but &quot;conserved,&quot; if they do it? They could make this one look like costume jewelry and call it &quot;acceptable.&quot; With the room they&#039;ve given us to rationalize they&#039;re right, they&#039;re a cinch for it.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve seen many that look crappy after the service. Mostly PCGS ones, as NGC came later to the service. But I&#039;ve not seen one, ever, go straight-graded, to conservation service, then details-graded, by the <i>same TPG</i>. Still waiting to see that one...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in