Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Great Southern Coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2264842, member: 28107"]I am not representing that any specific entity has engaged in illicit behavior or necessarily committed a tort, but I will tell you the law (both civil and criminal) and you can draw your own conclusions:</p><p><br /></p><p>Fraud is legally defined as having the following elements: (1) misrepresentation of a material fact; (2) with the intent to defraud and knowledge on the part of the accused that they were misrepresenting fact; (3) the misrepresentation was purposeful; (4) the victim believe the misrepresentation and relied upon it. In civil cases, it is a tort and punitive damages are available. Even when #2 (scienter/intent) is not there, it is constructive fraud and actionable civilly.</p><p><br /></p><p>Acquiring money by false pretenses is also a crime. Fraud is also a crime and most jurisdictions use the same elements as the civil tort, but it is tried by a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of evidence as opposed to clear and convincing evidence (or other high civil evidentiary standard - some jurisdiction use different names, but it is the same).</p><p><br /></p><p>So let's apply this to hypothetical eBay seller "X" (completely made up obviously). "X" repeatedly buys XF to AU coins and then whizzes them or cleans them to make them look uncirculated. "X" then uses deceptive imaging to further conceal evidence of manipulation/doctoring. "X" then sells the coins on eBay as "BU" knowing that the coins were altered and using misleading photographs to create the appearance that are of much higher condition and much more valuable.</p><p><br /></p><p>Looking at elements:</p><p>#1 - check - The listing represents the coin is BU and the images are made to make the coin to appear high grade</p><p><br /></p><p>#2 - check - You don't accidentally post deceptive photos and represent a coin as a higher grade</p><p><br /></p><p>#3 - check - How could characterize it as anything else?</p><p><br /></p><p>#4 - check - There are a number of clueless people who have bought duds from sellers like "X" only to learn that the coin is worth a mere fraction of what they paid because of gross overrepresentation.</p><p><br /></p><p>So I leave it to you; has seller "X" committed fraud? I'll let you be the judge, jury, and executioner (well maybe not the last one)... In my <b><u>opinion</u></b>, seller "X" is violating the law.</p><p><br /></p><p>And I am no saying that any specific seller is seller "X."</p><p><br /></p><p>Edited: 5:16 EST to add quote I am responding to for clarity and context.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2264842, member: 28107"]I am not representing that any specific entity has engaged in illicit behavior or necessarily committed a tort, but I will tell you the law (both civil and criminal) and you can draw your own conclusions: Fraud is legally defined as having the following elements: (1) misrepresentation of a material fact; (2) with the intent to defraud and knowledge on the part of the accused that they were misrepresenting fact; (3) the misrepresentation was purposeful; (4) the victim believe the misrepresentation and relied upon it. In civil cases, it is a tort and punitive damages are available. Even when #2 (scienter/intent) is not there, it is constructive fraud and actionable civilly. Acquiring money by false pretenses is also a crime. Fraud is also a crime and most jurisdictions use the same elements as the civil tort, but it is tried by a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of evidence as opposed to clear and convincing evidence (or other high civil evidentiary standard - some jurisdiction use different names, but it is the same). So let's apply this to hypothetical eBay seller "X" (completely made up obviously). "X" repeatedly buys XF to AU coins and then whizzes them or cleans them to make them look uncirculated. "X" then uses deceptive imaging to further conceal evidence of manipulation/doctoring. "X" then sells the coins on eBay as "BU" knowing that the coins were altered and using misleading photographs to create the appearance that are of much higher condition and much more valuable. Looking at elements: #1 - check - The listing represents the coin is BU and the images are made to make the coin to appear high grade #2 - check - You don't accidentally post deceptive photos and represent a coin as a higher grade #3 - check - How could characterize it as anything else? #4 - check - There are a number of clueless people who have bought duds from sellers like "X" only to learn that the coin is worth a mere fraction of what they paid because of gross overrepresentation. So I leave it to you; has seller "X" committed fraud? I'll let you be the judge, jury, and executioner (well maybe not the last one)... In my [B][U]opinion[/U][/B], seller "X" is violating the law. And I am no saying that any specific seller is seller "X." Edited: 5:16 EST to add quote I am responding to for clarity and context.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Great Southern Coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...