Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 2414434, member: 37839&quot;]No, I would not be looking at a &quot;realistic&quot; Ms 63 if I considered it as such.&nbsp; There are too many bag marks for it to be a 63.&nbsp; The one thing that coin has going for it, besides the VAM designation (which means nothing to me, as a longtime Morgan collector, as VAMs do not interest me at all) is a decent strike for the date.&nbsp; It is close to being a details coin based on all the surface damage, but for the fact that it has not circulated.&nbsp; That is why I went for a low grade MS--lots of hits, nicks, and scrapes on it--I stand by MS 61 at most.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in