Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Grading standards
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Morgandude11, post: 2105393, member: 37839"]That is simply untrue. I could post hundreds of pictures of weakly struck coins, with great surface preservation, super eye appeal, and no distracting marks that have graded 65, 66,67, and even 68. This is Doug's grading standard, not any professional one I've ever seen. Of course, strike is a component of grade, but plenty of beautiful coins that have below average strikes are appropriately graded much higher than 64.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Morgandude11, post: 2105393, member: 37839"]That is simply untrue. I could post hundreds of pictures of weakly struck coins, with great surface preservation, super eye appeal, and no distracting marks that have graded 65, 66,67, and even 68. This is Doug's grading standard, not any professional one I've ever seen. Of course, strike is a component of grade, but plenty of beautiful coins that have below average strikes are appropriately graded much higher than 64.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Grading standards
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...