Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;LuxUnit, post: 3734402, member: 90324&quot;]As a younger numismatist I don&#039;t have much exposure to grading tends over the years. Seeing a lot of submissions lately I&#039;ve noticed PCGS seems to be a little more strict and are really cracking down on toning. For example, lately there&#039;s been a lot of eBay sellers that are artificially toning copper cents with cleaning solution. PCGS has put a stop to many of these submissions where as I see NGC letting even blatant fakes through. </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m interested in other tends that you all have seen or experienced. Mainly: </p><p>-Are there periods where ANACS, NGC, or PCGS were overly aggressive with grading?</p><p>-Are there years where companies were more relaxed? </p><p>-Are there specific coins or trends that seemed to get special treatment on years? </p><p>-Or are there holders that seemed to show a difference in grading quality?</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m going to make a kind of timeline or Excel sheet for what everyone compiles. </p><p><br /></p><p>If there are comments you agree with please like them so I can get a feel for whats consistently been seen. Thanks![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in