Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Delmer, post: 210973, member: 8219&quot;]I get the general feeling from reading, that most folks who submit errors (for my purpouses.. I&#039;m talking specifically errors, not just any coin)&nbsp; know that certain graders have certain stigmas attached to them.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>If no one&#039;s scared.. and without doing things like posting rant based on a single negative experience.. would anyone like to try a list of facts or well known generalizations made about specific grading outfeits?</p><p><br /></p><p>Example..&nbsp; (none of these are actual.. only examples..&nbsp; if no one QUOTES these, I&#039;ll eventually delete them from here so no one finds the sentences in a search)</p><p><br /></p><p>- ANACS seems to grade conservatively probably due to their guarantee.. thus when you see a NGC MS-66, it&#039;s worth a ANACS MS-65</p><p><br /></p><p>- NCG is not the general first choice for ERROR research.. use {xyz grader}</p><p><br /></p><p>- SGS&#039; plusses include the almost unbreakable sealed package, but the foam dust is a bit bothersome.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>What I think would be useful is a consolodated opinion guide to services.. for error entheusiests, by entheusiests..&nbsp; Some boards have a &quot;vendor feedback&quot; section.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Selfishly, I have a smooth edge Washington $ with so called &quot;wild-whisker&quot; die crack and I&#039;m SURE no one will label it as such just yet.. (ANACS wouldn&#039;t label my edge-letter-shift Washington $ based on &quot;no published report of it&quot; {shrug} ) and I&#039;m wondering which outfit will likely do it FIRST and which outfit is the BEST to have an error labeled with?</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in