Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 2625257, member: 24314&quot;]<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> What a novel idea! Ever hear of ANACS? Unfortunately, the strict grading to ANA standards did not reflect what was going on in the industry and that entity along with ANA Grading standards failed to meet the demands of the coin market and was replaced by PCGS and NGC. </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve been told by a prominent professional grader/authenticator who the ANA tried to hire (he said no the first time) that for the first few years out in CO, ANACS employees knew nothing about eye appeal or the value of coins.&nbsp; After the big grading adjustment when 65&#039;s became 63&#039;s things got better but they lost the monopoly they should have had from the beginning as the ANA&#039;s grading service.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in