Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Paul M., post: 2625060, member: 73165&quot;]IMO this stuff is all well and good, and cited in proper APA format, but irrelevant to the point at hand.&nbsp; What I would like to see is enough consistency in the process to where I can submit the same coin to the same service 100 times and have it come back the same grade 95/100 times.&nbsp; That grade may vary per coin between services, but as long as there&#039;s such a level of consistency within each service, that can be accounted for.</p><p><br /></p><p>You can&#039;t easily determine that using a study of interrater variability of individual graders.&nbsp; And, IMO, we&#039;re never going to get to 95% reliability given the vagaries of grading as long as humans are the final arbiters of what goes on the label. I am not making an argument that machines should take over the grading process here, simply stating that I don&#039;t think humans can get to this level of reliability.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in