Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Insider, post: 2622361, member: 24314"]<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie9" alt=":eek:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie46" alt=":facepalm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie52" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Hummmm, because "there's little in-hand visual difference" in appearance between grades, that must explain why a 1901 Morgan dollar lists for: MS-60  $2650  May have heavy marks in all areas, poor eye appeal, may be hairlined with impaired luster.  MS-63  $14,700  May have detracting marks in PFA, may have a patch of hairlines and slightly impaired luster; but still attractive. MS-65  $$425,000  May have light scattered marks, fully original luster and very pleasing eye appeal. MS-66  ????   May have several small marks with above average original luster and exceptional eye appeal.[/QUOTE]