Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Grading is BS
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="davidh, post: 2620636, member: 15062"][MEDIA=youtube]cuSk3Mrb1uA[/MEDIA]</p><p><br /></p><p>Graders work on 800 coins a day. Not accounting for break times, that's 100 per hour or 1 minute, 40 seconds each. I doubt anyone can keep up with that kind of work load, all day long, without making significant errors. Admittedly, they're only right 80% of the time. The claim that differences between multiple graders will average out over time is nonsense. They're still going to be 80% accurate overall. The ideal that you can resubmit a coin multiple times until it gets a grade you like is fallicious; what you wind up with is a coin that is overgraded and a future buyer will still grade the coin himself, regardless of what the holder says.</p><p><br /></p><p>Bag marks are OK for some coins, not so for others. Wear can be overlooked on some high points, on some coins, as long as the wear spot is not discolored. Spots and fingerprints matter on some coins, no so much on others. Toning is bad for some coins but can be overlooked on others. The rarer a coin is, the more you can overlook defects that would bodybag another more common coin. Eye appeal (which is a rather vague term) can make or break a coin which is otherwise absolutely identical to another. Cleaning done decades ago can be overlooked but not on more recent coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>The acceptance of grading only matters if you're in this for future profit. On the other hand, if you're a collector who only wants to collect nice things, then the only consideration should be how the coin looks in hand. I've seen plenty of coins graded 55 or 58 which are far more desirable than some graded 65 or 66, simply because the 50's are visually better than the 60's which may have heavy toning and subsequent loss of visual detail. </p><p><br /></p><p>In the field of cars, I know of someone with a 1963 Pontiac "Swiss Cheese" Catalina</p><p>that's worth on the order of $750,000. It looks exactly the same as any other 1963 Pontiac Catalina worth $20,000. The former is parked in a garage and will never be driven on the street; the latter can be driven and enjoyed every day. This is how I see coins. You can go nuts seeking the perfect MS70 coin worth thousands and when you find it you put it in a vault somewhere, only to be seen on special occasions. Or you can be happy with a pretty EF or AU coin that you can keep on a shelf in your living room and enjoy every day.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="davidh, post: 2620636, member: 15062"][MEDIA=youtube]cuSk3Mrb1uA[/MEDIA] Graders work on 800 coins a day. Not accounting for break times, that's 100 per hour or 1 minute, 40 seconds each. I doubt anyone can keep up with that kind of work load, all day long, without making significant errors. Admittedly, they're only right 80% of the time. The claim that differences between multiple graders will average out over time is nonsense. They're still going to be 80% accurate overall. The ideal that you can resubmit a coin multiple times until it gets a grade you like is fallicious; what you wind up with is a coin that is overgraded and a future buyer will still grade the coin himself, regardless of what the holder says. Bag marks are OK for some coins, not so for others. Wear can be overlooked on some high points, on some coins, as long as the wear spot is not discolored. Spots and fingerprints matter on some coins, no so much on others. Toning is bad for some coins but can be overlooked on others. The rarer a coin is, the more you can overlook defects that would bodybag another more common coin. Eye appeal (which is a rather vague term) can make or break a coin which is otherwise absolutely identical to another. Cleaning done decades ago can be overlooked but not on more recent coins. The acceptance of grading only matters if you're in this for future profit. On the other hand, if you're a collector who only wants to collect nice things, then the only consideration should be how the coin looks in hand. I've seen plenty of coins graded 55 or 58 which are far more desirable than some graded 65 or 66, simply because the 50's are visually better than the 60's which may have heavy toning and subsequent loss of visual detail. In the field of cars, I know of someone with a 1963 Pontiac "Swiss Cheese" Catalina that's worth on the order of $750,000. It looks exactly the same as any other 1963 Pontiac Catalina worth $20,000. The former is parked in a garage and will never be driven on the street; the latter can be driven and enjoyed every day. This is how I see coins. You can go nuts seeking the perfect MS70 coin worth thousands and when you find it you put it in a vault somewhere, only to be seen on special occasions. Or you can be happy with a pretty EF or AU coin that you can keep on a shelf in your living room and enjoy every day.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Grading is BS
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...