I can see now how the obverse dies can be used together to make a coin if you REALLY wanted to... but this coin doesn't appear to have been struck with the force that I would expect from a US Mint coin and I think that the strike is the tell-tale sign of this. While I understand what improper die alignment will do, I don't think that it will leave the lack of design and plethora of planchet flaws that the PCGS two headed coin exhibits.
All the same, what sticks in my mind (in addition to Doug's point, which is also valid) is that the coin appears to have a developed rim, implying a proper collar. My current working theory is one obverse die in place as the hammer, and something round but not hard enough jury-rigged as the anvil. That could maybe result in what we see here.
I thought PCGS had some integrity. To certify this coin as legit, and to grade it the ridiculous MS-65, they lose all credibility to me. I grade this illegal coin details VF-30.
Calling something illegal when you have no idea or proof how it was made or what actually happened is rediculous to me. Just because someone doesn't understand something doesn't mean a tpg now has no credibility and the coin is illegal I guess you are also saying Mike Byers also has no credibility since he's selling it?
well, not to put too fine a point on this but... if it was made clandestinely (not an approved Mint product) at the Mint, it's illegal. if it is a counterfeit... it's also illegal. I'd like to know under what circumstances this coin is legal... anyone?
Not ridiculous. It is my belief that this coin was not produced via the day to day operations at the mint. In fact, as shown by another poster the way the dies work, it is impossible to make this coin during production. It would have to be struck with another planchet under it, and then flipped over and struck again, with a planchet under it. Is that more likely to happen, then someone made it clandestinely? It is my opinion that this is an illegal coin. And the MS-65 grade is pathetic.
Plenty of coins were not approved that came out of then,isn't that have been trading for decades. But prove it that happened, where's the video of someone doing it? You should email mike then and let him know his coin could be counterfeit because someone randomly said it and that he and pcgs don't know what they're doing
Actually, that won't produce a coin like the one in question. It would produce a coin with one side somewhat clear and the other side smashed. In order for both sides to be the same, they must be struck at the same time.
Well, and the other planchet that was underneath ( 1 or 2) would also be a nice error coin. I don't think that is what happened, but how could a 2 headed coin like this be produced during the day to day production of nickels? Just trying to figure out how it was made. I believe the most logical way is for someone on the inside to create it with 2 obverse dies.
I think that is a great question and one that we, as collectors can learn heaps from. That's kind of why I have pursued this thread and continue to ask questions ven if not related to the original post.
There's no question you're right on the counterfeit line. As for the rest, well, that's a subject that's open to debate, and has been for a loooooooong time. What about the 1894-S dime, or the 1913 Liberty nickels, or any of the several other coins similar to them, including the ones produced by the dies I posted pictures of - are they legal ? In point of fact, it may not even be possible to answer that question. That might be why nobody ever has.
I think that it's been well-established that anything minted post 1970 has been aggressively fought for by the government, but yes, it appears to be as they see fit on a case by case basis
I believe the 5 1913 nickels are illegal coins and should have been confiscated early on. The fact that they have been bought and sold a number of times in the last 100 years makes it more difficult to confiscate now, (paper trail of ownership). The govt is not going to reimburse someone a million dollars for one of these nickels, which would result in a long court battle, bad press, etc. when they have other priorities. "Let's drop everything and chase down these 5 nickels." That has escaped the dragnet. If a 1964 Peace dollar were to surface, that is subject to confiscation. So a legit specimen would have to pop up and be sold outside the US to skirt the legalities.
It really doesn't, and hasn't had anything to do with when the coins are produced Mike. The Martha Washington coins and the Sacky mules are prime examples of that, both produced in '99 and 2000 respectively. In fact with the Sacky mules the point hinged on determining how the coins were released, and or found as the case may be. A mint employee was caught trying to carry one out, he was prosecuted. Others were found in the wild - no problem. But nobody knows for certain how they got out either. And the mules, and not just the Sackys but the others as well, also present the issue of how did they come to be to begin with ? Similarly to this double headed nickel, their very existence shouldn't have been possible in most people's eyes - but yet they exist. And isn't that the thing ? You see, it's not just in the US that this phenomena exist, it's world wide. Many, many, examples of doubled headed and double tailed coins, and mules, that have been certified and documented as genuine exist, made in various countries from all over the world. So it quickly becomes evident that not only is it possible, it happens far more often than most realize. And when you have that many the question then arises that maybe, just maybe, they can be legitimate errors. And it is then that we must realize that what we choose to believe, just might not be true after all.
The term of Coinflation is now beginning to strike home with me especially after seeing this coin as MS-65 from PCGS. Now on to my to next bewilderment, does the new Standard will allow us to grade any blank planchet coin as MS-60 if poorly stuck?
Hey, whoever helped this someone with a one of a kind. Mint employee or not, Those are really close obv. dies. ad I don't think I could do any better if given the circumstance. I still don't agree and would pass if I found it for sale.