Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Grading Guides - the Good and Bad
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 883503, member: 15309"]I am glad you brought that point up. I have always thought that photos do a great job at helping people understand both surface preservation, wear patterns, and strike. Photos of these elements in combination with written text can be very educational. However, they are abysmal at showing luster which really affects eye appeal. In addition, the written text is often just as abysmal in these areas.</p><p><br /></p><p>For example, how many newbies can view photos and read descriptions of frosty and satin luster and actually understand the difference. Understanding the different types of luster becomes much easier when viewing actual coins. I don't know one collector who can understand the characteristics of artificial toning based on grading guides. They throw terms out like "crayon colors" and "floats on the surface" which leaves the uneducated reader at a complete loss. It is only after viewing hundreds of both naturally and artificially toned coins that these terms begin to have any meaning. This Roosevelt Dime is a perfect example of what I am talking about.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Roosevelt%20Dimes/RooseveltDime1963RawAT.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>From the photo, it is hard to understand how the color "floats on the surface" of the coin. In hand, the described effect becomes very obvious. Many advanced collectors can't even describe artificial toning other than to say the coin doesn't look right. It is something that is very hard to put into words or photos.</p><p><br /></p><p>In the end, I believe that understanding grading requires all of the above. Books are a great starting point, photos help many collectors understand the written text much better, but there really is no substitute for hands on experience. In that regard, coin grading is really no different than any other discipline of life. The formal education is nice but is rather meaningless without experience.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 883503, member: 15309"]I am glad you brought that point up. I have always thought that photos do a great job at helping people understand both surface preservation, wear patterns, and strike. Photos of these elements in combination with written text can be very educational. However, they are abysmal at showing luster which really affects eye appeal. In addition, the written text is often just as abysmal in these areas. For example, how many newbies can view photos and read descriptions of frosty and satin luster and actually understand the difference. Understanding the different types of luster becomes much easier when viewing actual coins. I don't know one collector who can understand the characteristics of artificial toning based on grading guides. They throw terms out like "crayon colors" and "floats on the surface" which leaves the uneducated reader at a complete loss. It is only after viewing hundreds of both naturally and artificially toned coins that these terms begin to have any meaning. This Roosevelt Dime is a perfect example of what I am talking about. [IMG]http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Roosevelt%20Dimes/RooseveltDime1963RawAT.jpg[/IMG] From the photo, it is hard to understand how the color "floats on the surface" of the coin. In hand, the described effect becomes very obvious. Many advanced collectors can't even describe artificial toning other than to say the coin doesn't look right. It is something that is very hard to put into words or photos. In the end, I believe that understanding grading requires all of the above. Books are a great starting point, photos help many collectors understand the written text much better, but there really is no substitute for hands on experience. In that regard, coin grading is really no different than any other discipline of life. The formal education is nice but is rather meaningless without experience.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Grading Guides - the Good and Bad
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...