Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Grading Guides - the Good and Bad
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kanga, post: 882800, member: 9270"]Yes, I know. When you select an issue you wish to collect you should do some indepth studying before you put serious money into the coins.</p><p>But as a type set collector that is not an option for me.</p><p>So along with other things I depend upon grading guides.</p><p> </p><p>I just received my copy of <i>Grading Coins by Photographs</i> by Q. David Bowers.</p><p>After a quick look I see several disappointments:</p><p><br /></p><p>1. The images are too small (that was someone else's opinion also).</p><p>I guess the intend was to show the coin as you would see it in-hand with just your eyes.</p><p>I would have preferred something at about 3x magnification.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. The images aren't particularly sharp.</p><p>I see that a a combination of the small size and the printing method (half tone screens I believe its called).</p><p><br /></p><p>3. The verbal descriptions are no better than the ANA guide.</p><p> </p><p>~~~~~~~~~~</p><p><br /></p><p>I'd rate the Bowers book at best third behind these:</p><p><br /></p><p>#1 - <i>Making the Grade</i> from <i>Coin Values</i></p><p>Good - Images at about 1½-2x</p><p>Bad - Book covers only 25 of the most popular issues.</p><p><br /></p><p>#2 - ANA Grading Guide</p><p>1-1½x images</p><p>As close to the "standard" as currently exists.</p><p><br /></p><p>No opinion on <i>Photograde</i> since my copy is from the mid-70's (I hope they've improved it since then).</p><p><br /></p><p>I always considered Brown & Dunn as only marginally useful.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kanga, post: 882800, member: 9270"]Yes, I know. When you select an issue you wish to collect you should do some indepth studying before you put serious money into the coins. But as a type set collector that is not an option for me. So along with other things I depend upon grading guides. I just received my copy of [I]Grading Coins by Photographs[/I] by Q. David Bowers. After a quick look I see several disappointments: 1. The images are too small (that was someone else's opinion also). I guess the intend was to show the coin as you would see it in-hand with just your eyes. I would have preferred something at about 3x magnification. 2. The images aren't particularly sharp. I see that a a combination of the small size and the printing method (half tone screens I believe its called). 3. The verbal descriptions are no better than the ANA guide. ~~~~~~~~~~ I'd rate the Bowers book at best third behind these: #1 - [I]Making the Grade[/I] from [I]Coin Values[/I] Good - Images at about 1½-2x Bad - Book covers only 25 of the most popular issues. #2 - ANA Grading Guide 1-1½x images As close to the "standard" as currently exists. No opinion on [I]Photograde[/I] since my copy is from the mid-70's (I hope they've improved it since then). I always considered Brown & Dunn as only marginally useful.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Grading Guides - the Good and Bad
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...