Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;NPCoin, post: 143062, member: 5629&quot;]He&#039;s right and wrong <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, it&#039;s a mistake by ANACS.&nbsp; I have a similar mistake and am now in the possession of a lovely Bahamas gold proof in striking MS69 condition :goofer: </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>But, ANACS will <b>NOT</b> correct their mistake for free.&nbsp; You would have to resubmit it to ANACS and pay for a re-holdering.&nbsp; That and the fact that they tend to ignore their customer&#039;s inquiries are the only things I personally have against ANACS.&nbsp; Otherwise, their grading is fairly consistent with ANA standards.</p><p><br /></p><p>This could, however, have a detrimental effect on, let&#039;s say, a 1960 Franklin proof in PR66 grade that is holdered as a 1960 Frankie MS66.&nbsp; Now, <b>there</b> would be a problem, IMHO.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in